Tamil Nadu - Chennai   

Exemplary cost for "strange" plea

Special Correspondent

The matter relates to a cheque dishonoured for want of sufficient funds

CHENNAI: The Madras High Court has imposed an "exemplary cost" of Rs. 5,000 on persons who had filed a writ petition with a "strange prayer" that the court quash or transfer the unnumbered proceedings against them pending in a magistrate court at Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

The matter relates to a cheque dishonoured for want of sufficient funds. Claiming that the judicial magistrate court at Raipur had initiated criminal proceedings against the petitioners and issued summons, the petition sought to quash the process.

Justice K. Chandru said: "It is not known ... how the petitioners can file a writ petition even before the process can be issued by the competent criminal court... It is stated in the affidavit that they have received summons from the court for hearing, even though there was no such summons in respect of this case. Therefore it is clearly a false statement... It is a clear abuse of process of court, and there is absolutely no cause of action for the petitioners to file this writ petition and clubbing it along with other writ petitions where the process has been issued."

"No transfer"

As for the prayer to transfer the case from the Raipur court to the magistrate court at Coonoor in Tamil Nadu, the judge said: "Such a prayer cannot be countenanced by this court, as it is incompetent to make any inter-State transfer under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure." The petitioners, who had cited the Raipur judicial magistrate also as a respondent, said he ought to have postponed the process and should have ordered an investigation.

Rejecting the submission, the judge said: "This is not an offence arising out of any other enactment but an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Therefore, there was no necessity for investigating the commission of any offence, and the only method that is contemplated under Section 138 of the NI Act is filing a private complaint. There is no other option open to the magistrate but to issue the process."

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

Madras University signs MoU with Australian varsity
After the flood of traffic, an ordeal by water
In Pallikaranai, a recurrent problem
Air France's Paris-Chennai inaugural flight lands
South Australia, Tamil Nadu forge sister-state agreement
Kottivakkam industrial estate hit by rains, power shutdown
Simplifying problems in learning math
Even elders can fall prey to alcoholism
Stalin reviews flood relief measures
Exemplary cost for "strange" plea
End of the road for Thannithurai market?
Nalini's writ petition closed
POTA detenues move High Court
MMM hospitals set to mark silver jubilee
Did not impose candidate, says Karunanidhi
Canal to let out excess rainwater proposed at Maduravoyal
Taramani bedevilled by waterlogging
Little Masters perform with zeal and confidence
Foreign Post turns a new leaf
Indian Science Congress opens on January 3
Three arrested for credit card fraud
"Raghu manufactured some parts of empty rocket shells in his Padi unit"
Iyal Isai Nadaka Mandram selects performing artists
Telecom firm employees arrested on fraud charges
DMK's response adds insult to injury: PMK
Ministers throng this girl's Arangetram
History of Tamil theatre on BBC Tamil service
Taking no chances
Cooperative polls before year-end
Town bus services extended
In a different world
Correction
Around the City
In Chennai Today

Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu