Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Sunday, Aug 27, 2006
Google



Tamil Nadu
News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary |

Tamil Nadu - Chennai Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

"Jayalalithaa trying to prolong cases"

Special Correspondent

Income Tax department tells High Court "The mental state of the person accused of wilful failure cannot be proved by the department."

CHENNAI : The Income Tax Department has told the Madras High Court that the former Chief Minister, Jayalalithaa, and her friend Sasikala, had challenged the constitutional validity of Section 278E of the Income Tax Act only to prolong the IT cases against them.

A counter-affidavit, filed by V.K. Pandey, Commissioner of Income Tax (Central-II Chennai), justified Section 278E of the Act, which requires the accused person to produce material to disprove the charge of wilful failure to file income tax returns. "Under this Section, it will be for the accused to produce material to discharge his burden of disproving the existence of a culpable state of mind," he said.

Wilful failure

The mental state of the person accused of wilful failure cannot be proved by the department and therefore the burden has to be shifted to the accused to show that he or she did not have such mental state of wilful failure to furnish returns of income, the counter said.

It also alleged that Ms. Jayalalithaa and Ms. Sasikala had challenged the provision, which was in the statute book for more than 20 years, only to ensure that the cases against them did not attain finality at the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Economic Offences Court-I) at Egmore, expeditiously.

"The attempt of the petitioner is only to drag on the proceedings pending before the court. Such intention becomes clear from the fact that the petitioners have successfully dragged on the prosecution under some pretext or the other from time to time for about 10 years," the Commissioner submitted.

The petitioners had also successfully avoided the verdict in the appeals preferred by them and pending before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in Chennai, he added.

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Tamil Nadu

News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Jobs | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |

Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu