Opinion - Letters to the Editor   

Temples and traditions

This refers to the article "Temples and traditions" (June 1). The Tamil Nadu Government's decision to appoint qualified persons irrespective of caste as priests in Hindu temples is a classic case of the state meddling with religion. Ayyannar and Mariamman temples have a tradition of appointing non-Brahmin priests. Village temples have pujaris who enjoy hereditary rights and they are mostly non-Brahmins. Tradition may appear skewed today. But if it does not affect the mainstream, it must be preserved.

Siva Sivasubramanian,
Beecroft, Sydney

The DMK Government's decision is based on the false premise that Brahmins outnumber others as priests. There is no direction in the Hindu sastras that Brahmins alone should be appointed priests. It is common knowledge that many village temples are owned by non-Brahmins and the priests performing puja in them are non-Brahmins. Many other groups of priests are not Brahmins either.

B. Ranganathan,
Chennai

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail

Stories in this Section

An opportunity to unite people
Republicans in trouble
Caste matters in the Indian media
Corrections and clarifications
Monsoon and the weatherman's woes
New test offers speedy reading of genetic make-up
Praise for police
Wrong decision
Reservation row
Temples and traditions
"There is a very deep-rooted prejudice"

Copyright © 2006, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu