![]() Online edition of India's National Newspaper Tuesday, Feb 07, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Opinion |
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |
Opinion
-
Letters to the Editor
The argument in favour of denying the judiciary the power to sit in judgment on the legislature is that Parliament reflects the will of the people and that their will is supreme in a democracy. The problem with this argument is Parliament decides matters by a majority vote. Its decisions, therefore, do not necessarily represent the will of the people as a whole. There is need for a constitutional mechanism to prevent the majority riding roughshod over the minority. The judiciary provides just that mechanism.
K. Vijayakumar,
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
Karnataka |
Kerala |
New Delhi |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Engagements |
|
|
|
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | Sportstar | Frontline | Publications | eBooks | Images | Home |
Copyright © 2006, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|