Online edition of India's National Newspaper
Friday, Dec 23, 2005
Google



Opinion
News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |

Opinion - Letters to the Editor Printer Friendly Page   Send this Article to a Friend

Reservation Bill

If the objective of the 104th amendment to the Constitution is to enable more people from the socially and economically backward sections to get access to education in private, unaided institutions, it has failed because it excludes minority-run institutions from its purview. It is ironical that the religion of the founders and stakeholders of educational institutions has been made a predominant factor in the conception of the bill.

Aravind Sridhar,
New Delhi

* * *

The bill is only a means adopted by all parties to garner votes. Had their intentions been genuine, minority institutions would not have been excluded. The exclusion is again guided by vote bank considerations. Merit has been given the go-by.

S. Raghothaman,
Chennai

* * *

The amendment has rendered long-awaited justice to the people of other backward classes. The MPs should be thanked for rising above party considerations to pass the bill.

N. Jayaraj,
Chennai

* * *

The passage of the bill in the Lok Sabha is a radical step towards rendering social justice in a society subjected to centuries of discrimination. However, we must not continue to be pegged to caste to derive the benefits of reservation. We must switch over to the economic criterion and empower the weaker sections among the socially backward through education and employment.

M. Govindaswamy,
Chennai

* * *

The bill is a precursor to reservation in the private sector. Unfortunately, both measures are tantamount to backdoor part-nationalisation of privately owned facilities without paying compensation. Instead of enacting a law that deprives private unaided institutions of their right to admit students, the Centre and State Governments could have doubled the intake in their own and aided institutions by starting a second shift, which is both economical and fulfils the objective of helping the deprived.

P.V. Maiya,
Bangalore

Printer friendly page  
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail



Opinion

News: Front Page | National | Tamil Nadu | Andhra Pradesh | Karnataka | Kerala | New Delhi | Other States | International | Opinion | Business | Sport | Miscellaneous | Engagements |
Advts:
Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Updates: Breaking News |


News Update


The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | The Hindu Images | Home |

Copyright © 2005, The Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu