Thursday, Aug 26, 2004
Front Page |
Tamil Nadu |
Andhra Pradesh |
New Delhi |
Other States |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary |
By Julian Borger© Guardian Newspapers Limited 2004
WASHINGTON, AUG. 25. An official report on the Abu Ghraib abuse scandal yesterday blamed a failure of leadership at the Pentagon for negligence over prison conditions and confusion over interrogation rules, which led to "Animal House" sadism in the Iraqi jail.
The report, by a four-member panel of Pentagon advisers, did not pin direct responsibility on the Defence Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, by name, nor did it find any top officials legally culpable.
The worst abuse at Abu Ghraib, it said, was carried out by night shift guards. But the report represented an implicit indictment of Mr. Rumsfeld's management of the Defence Department.
"We believe there is institutional and personal responsibility right up the chain of command as far as Washington is concerned," James Schlesinger, a former Defence Secretary who chaired the panel, told reporters yesterday.
For the first time since the Abu Ghraib scandal broke in March, the Schlesinger report officially made a connection between the actions or omissions of the Bush administration and the brutal treatment of prisoners in U.S. military prisons, and could deepen the damage already done by the affair to the President's re-election effort. "I think this is going to be more of a problem than they anticipated when they appointed this panel," said Professor Scott Silliman, an expert on military law at Duke University in North Carolina. The Schlesinger report depicts the torture scandal as one of the unseen circumstances of poor planning by the Pentagon leadership. "In Iraq, there was not only a failure to plan for a major insurgency, but also to adapt to the insurgency that followed after major combat operations," the report found, adding that the war plan assumed a period of "relatively benign stability" would precede transfer of power to new Iraqi authorities.
More damning details of the use of torture against Iraqi prisoners are expected to surface today with results of a separate army investigation into the role of military intelligence at Abu Ghraib.
Leaks from that report, published in the Washington Post yesterday, included a finding that some guards used dogs to terrify prisoners as young as 15 in a sadistic game aimed at making their victims wet themselves in fear.
The report will also mention evidence that at least one Iraqi male detenu was raped.Mr. Schlesinger said yesterday that `chaos' reigned at Abu Ghraib.
He said there was "sadism on the nightshift" and added, "It was a kind of Animal House on the night shift," in a reference to the 1978 film which portrays the unsavoury antics of a bunch of hedonistic students.
"There is no evidence of a policy of abuse promulgated by senior officials or military authorities," the Schlesinger report found. But Mr. Schlesinger said yesterday: "There was indirect responsibility at higher levels in that the weaknesses at Abu Ghraib were well known, and corrective action could have been taken and should have been taken." The report said "confusing and inconsistent interrogation technique policies" issued by the Pentagon and the White House itself contributed to the belief among officers and soldiers that they could use methods that had been allowed at Guantanamo Bay but banned in Iraq.
The panel also found fault with America's top generals in the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for failing to make sufficient manpower and resources available at Abu Ghraib prison and the rest of a huge network of military jails that has sprung up around the world since the launch of the "war on terror."
The former U.S. force commander in Iraq, Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez, was singled out for blame in the report. But he, too, escaped legal responsibility, and the panel did not recommend a formal reprimand.
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription
Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | The Hindu eBooks | Home |
Copyright © 2004, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of