![]() Tuesday, Dec 17, 2002 |
| Southern States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Southern States
-
Tamil Nadu-Chennai
By Karthik Subramanian
After receiving four written complaints, the civic officials extended the last date for submission of contracts to December 18. Today, the Corporation Commissioner, M. Kalaivanan, dismissed such "incidents" as hurdles the civic agency needed to overcome. The Corporation would ensure a safe and transparent tender processing system so that the taxpayer's money was properly accounted for, he said. But contractors are not swayed by such statements. At least for a section of those contractors, which does not have `political support', the writing is on the wall it will have to accept the very system it developed over the years with the connivance of officials and elected representatives. One of the contractors, who has been pursuing tenders for the last 10 years, said they were just getting a taste of their own medicine. For several years now, the contractors adopted two methods to acquire contracts against the `legal' competitive bidding model. First, the `direct compromise' model. To start off, the prospective bidder acquires the list of all those who bought tender applications. "Then the contractor would strike a compromise with one of the bidders to get him to withdraw from the race. The other bidders agree upon the same amount and it is settled. The successful contractor then places his bid lower than the others," said one of the contractors, on condition of anonymity. Second, the `open bidding' model. There is an open bidding among those who purchased the tender schedules. This took place usually at the zonal offices, where the tender documents used to be submitted earlier. The bidder with the highest percentage would take the contract. The percentage quoted is equally distributed among the `unsuccessful' bidders. The problem now is a third model that some of the contractors have come up with. Instead of the previous models in which the money is shared among contractors, the prospective bidder decided to approach the local politician for support. Even in these two models, the politicians got their `cut'. But now, the percentage gets higher with the elimination of the contractors to share the spoils. Once bitten, some of the contractors now acknowledge that at least 10-15 per cent of any work is lost even in the process of getting it. The compromise is reflected in the quality of work, be it roads or buildings. "Usually the roads are not laid to the thickness as per specifications, and the width is reduced. In the case of buildings, the scope for saving money is more. We sometimes use lime to paint the wall and mark it distemper. Only, we have very few options to sustain ourselves after all the kickbacks".
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|