![]() Friday, Jul 05, 2002 |
| Southern States | ||
|
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
Advts: Classifieds | Employment | Obituary | Southern States
-
Tamil Nadu
By A. Subramani
`No wilful disobedience'
Earlier, the Advocate-General, N.R. Chandran, argued that the contempt petition was bereft of any merit since there was no wilful disobedience on the part of the respondent-officials. ``The contempt petition is being used as a legal thumbscrew to get some favourable order. It should be dismissed as it is''.
In his counter-affidavit, Mr. Thiagarajan said that since he had not been made a respondent in the original writ petition, he could not be included in the contempt petition. ``Both in law and on fact, the application is not maintainable as it is not filed by the aggrieved party (Mr. Stalin)''.
Printer friendly
page
News:
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Miscellaneous |
|
|
|
The Hindu Group: Home | About Us | Copyright | Archives | Contacts | Subscription Group Sites: The Hindu | Business Line | The Sportstar | Frontline | Home |
Copyright © 2002, The
Hindu. Republication or redissemination of the contents of
this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of
The Hindu
|