|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, November 26, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Features
| Previous
| Next
A peace movement is born
After two years of local campaigns against the nuclearisation of
India, citizens' groups came together recently in New Delhi to
move on to the next stage. A report by C. RAMMANOHAR REDDY.
AN event of hopefully great significance for India and all of
South Asia took place in New Delhi earlier this month. After
three days of deliberations, grassroots workers, former members
of the armed forces, trade unionists, students, scientists,
doctors and artistes from around the country decided to
constitute the Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace, the
first country-wide network against weapons of mass destruction.
Sadly, the happening was barely noticed by the media, which is
very attentive when it comes to reporting bellicose statements
and offering considerable space to analysis that is only one step
away from a call to arms.
A peace movement is not totally new to India. Over the years, a
number of small groups in India and Pakistan have tried to build
bridges over the flames fanned by the governments of the two
countries. On a parallel track, a handful of organisations like
the Movement in India for Nuclear Disarmament and the Physicians
for Peace, have worked to highlight the dangers of South Asia
going nuclear. The Pokhran tests of May 1998 changed all that.
While political parties across the mainstream spectrum initially
either vied with each other to express their support for a
nuclear India or chose to congratulate scientists who had
demonstrated their prowess at the 50-year-old technology of
nuclear tests, it was left to citizens' groups to oppose the
dangerous path that the Government had taken. New groups like the
Indian Scientists against Nuclear Weapons sprouted to work
alongside grassroots organisations in the campaign against
nuclearisation. Small these groups were, but they were numerous
and widespread enough to deny the establishment's claims of "a
national consensus" in support of nuclear weapons.
While the campaign against the horrors of nuclearisation has
continued, the actions have been local and independent of each
other. To build up co-ordinated action and give the campaign a
new momentum, a few groups took the first initiative to hold a
"National Convention for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace" in New
Delhi between November 11 and 13. More than 100 citizens' groups
around the country interacted over six months in preparation for
the meeting. The results were there to see. Over 600 delegates,
double the expected number, participated in the convention which
was financed solely by citizens' groups and individuals and was
an entirely voluntary exercise. This was not a "Delhi" show, as
events in the capital frequently turn out to be. More than 450 of
the 600-odd delegates were from outside New Delhi. There were
residents of rural Rajasthan, Kashmir and Bihar rubbing shoulders
with trade unionists from Mumbai. Grassroots workers from Bengal
and Tamil Nadu joined hands with retired personnel from the armed
forces. Artistes, students and teachers from New Delhi were
together with scientists from Bangalore. The organisation by
volunteers was remarkable. There were two days of intense
discussions in more than 20 working groups that dealt with
nuclear doctrines, militarisation, nuclear power, networking,
advocacy and campaign strategies. While discussions went on late
into the evening, the sessions were interspersed with folk music,
street theatre, slide shows and films. (The documentary "Buddha
Weeps at Jaduguda" which gave a frightening picture of what is
going on in Jharkhand where the uranium for India's nuclear power
and weapons programme is mined will convince even the most
sceptical citizen about how casual India's atomic energy/weapons
establishment can be about safety and how callous it can be
towards those living around nuclear facilities.)
In what gave the convention a truly global character, the Indian
delegates were joined by 50 representatives from Pakistan and
peace activists from the small countries (Bangladesh, Nepal and
Sri Lanka) in the nuclear shadow of South Asia. Also present to
share their experiences were representatives of well-known peace
and disarmament movements in West Europe, North America, Japan,
Australia and New Zealand like the Campaign for Nuclear
Disarmament, Abolition 2000 and the Japan Congress against Atomic
and Hydrogen Bombs.
On the third day of the convention, the delegates decided to form
the "National Coalition for Nuclear Disarmament and Peace
(NCNDP)". As the name suggests, the NCNDP is not going to be a
centralised organisation but a co-ordinating coalition for groups
opposed to nuclear weapons. The brief interim charter of the
NCNDP demands first of all that India stop assembly of nuclear
weapons, halt development of delivery systems (i.e. missiles)
that can deliver these weapons and end production of weapons-
grade fissile material (i.e. plutonium). It also demands complete
transparency in this area and calls for proper compensation to
all people harmed by government activities in the nuclear fuel
cycle - from uranium mining to reactor operation to waste
disposal. The charter calls for a similar roll-back in Pakistan
and demands that the five nuclear weapons states immediately de-
alert their weapon systems, commit themselves to a No First Use
strategy and stop all research into advanced weapons. (A 50-
member national co-ordinating committee was also constituted to
prepare a more detailed charter for the first country-wide peace
coalition.)
The NCNDP also drew up a detailed action plan for the next year.
Some of the components are:
* To establish a "clearing house" of information to generate
public awareness about nuclear weapons and a lack of transparency
in the nuclear power sector.
* To build up a dialogue with all political parties, mass
organisations, religious bodies and professional associations.
* To support organisations fighting the cause of nuclear
radiation.
* To help set up a national federation of radiation victims.
* To work with the Pakistan Peace Coalition (PPC) to identify 10
schools and 10 colleges in India and Pakistan which will be
"sister" institutions that will discuss disarmament and peace.
* To liase with the PPC and prepare for a joint Indo-Pakistan
civil society initiative that would highlight the dangers of
nuclearisation of South Asia.
It was not as if there was unanimity at the convention on all
issues. Many delegates had strong and differing views on India's
nuclear power programme and the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty
(CTBT). The discussions on power, in particular, were quite
heated. While grassroots organisations working in Bihar,
Rajasthan and Tamil Nadu - areas where the environment and health
fall-outs of government activities in different stages of the
nuclear fuel cycle have led to considerable local protests -
could not see how the nuclear power programme could be separated
from weapons production, there were some who were against a
clubbing of the two. If yet these differences did not come in the
way of the formation of the NCNDP and formulation of a plan of
action, then credit must go to the six months of preparatory work
during which many of these differences were aired and compromises
worked out.
In any case, a rainbow of views in anti-nuclear weapons movements
are not uncommon around the world. Coalitions everywhere contain
differences on specific issues while they remain focussed on the
larger goals. Mr. Dave Knight, head of the Campaign for Nuclear
Disarmament in the United Kingdom, who was a delegate to the
convention, observed that "Where it took us years to agree on a
broad agenda, it is a remarkable achievement of the Indian
activists to have come to the same position so quickly".
Forming a platform and drawing up a plan of action is one thing.
Building up a mass campaign and lobbying with the political
establishment is the more difficult and longer term task. It will
be a long haul. But a beginning was made in New Delhi on the road
to a safer, more secure and nuclear-free South Asia, which is
quite the opposite of what the nuclear scientists, the strategic
thinkers and political elites have created for us.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Features Previous : Media and women: Images of reality Next : Waltzing with the jumbo jet | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|