|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, November 26, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Sport
| Previous
| Next
AIFF-IPFA stalemate can affect players' future
By S. R. Suryanarayan
CHENNAI, NOV 25: To commend the adamant stand or pity the
foolhardiness, is the question. But the fact remains that the
stalemate reflected in the stand-off between the AIFF and the
newly formed IPFA, could have grave implications on the players'
future. The point simply put is where do the players stand if
things remain unresolved?
While it is sometimes openly said that the players generally
prefer to give their all for their clubs rather than for the
country, no player would still wish to find his name black-listed
and thereby foreclose his career opportunities.
The price to pay for indiscretion can be very heavy. Being a
member of any leading club has its plus points and rewards, but
in the present circumstances a player has a very crucial decision
to take about his own future. Pity the players who have to find
reason in this confusion. It is all fine for the newly formed
body to arrange a league of its own, if it comes to that and get
the benefit of live telecast on a private channel but without
official sanction where will it stand?
And here the real picture could be different if the AIFF on its
part goes ahead to conduct the NFL. This could mean replacing
those clubs under the IPFA banner with the next-in- standing
units from the premier league's second division.
What is a loss for one could be a god-send opportunity for
another. For instance, Indian Bank Chennai, a team that lost out
by a whisker two years ago amid a speck of controversy. The team
would welcome any chance of being in the premier league again
with both hands, as it were.
As D. V. Sundar, Sports Secretary of the Bank, who did not waste
time in shooting a quick letter of support to the AIFF President
Priyaranjan Dasmunshi, put it, ``chances like this cannot be set
aside. Besides, our team has had a good record in the NFL and
there is no reason why we should not perform again given a
chance.''
Realistically, however, no matter what the outcome of the tussle
between IPFA and AIFF, the onus should be on the latter to ensure
that players do not suffer for something they are not responsible
for. For, a club's decision is fashioned by the management
decision and not by the players.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Sport Previous : Gillespie recalled for second Test Next : Mukeh Kumar triumphs | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Science & Tech |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|