|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, April 26, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
National
| Next
Sonia vs. Vajpayee: an unequal contest
By Harish Khare
NEW DELHI, APRIL 25. It was unequal contest between Mr. Atal
Behari Vajpayee and Ms. Sonia Gandhi, one a veteran of the game
and other a first-term member with only just a little over six
months of parliamentary career. Predictably, the outcome was
rather one-sided, with Mr. Vajpayee being the clear winner even
though he did not make a great speech; he has certainly delivered
better speeches in the past. The contest could even be described
as unfair but for the fact that it was sought entirely by the
Congress(I) parliamentary managers, who were insistent that Ms.
Gandhi speak immediately preceding the Prime Minister.
Yet, both the treasury and the Opposition benches were aware that
the spotlight was on Ms. Gandhi. She also knew she was in the
spotlight. For the Congressmen, of course, it was a major
occasion; silent cheer-leaders like Mrs. Moshina Kidwai, Mr.
Vasant Sathe, Mrs. Ambika Soni and Mrs. Rajendra Kumari Bhattal
had positioned themselves in the gallery opposite the Congress
benches as if their presence would infuse confidence in Ms.
Gandhi in her own debating potential.
Even the ministerial benches were crowded; Dr. Murli Manohar
Joshi with the familiar smirk, Mr. L. K. Advani had a look of
seriousness, and the Prime Minister himself wore a benign smile
when Ms. Gandhi was invited by a heckler to speak in Hindi; Mr.
Vaiko encouraged her to proceed in English. Mr. Jaswant Singh was
attentive and could be observed gently nudging his neighbour, Mr.
Mursoli Maran when Ms. Gandhi charged the Government with
``secretly'' signing away India's trade interests; and, Mr. Singh
was positively alert and even took off his reading glasses when
the Leader of the Opposition bemoaned India's Foreign Minister
escorting freed terrorists back to Kandahar.
The Congress(I) benches applauded their leader a few times, and
would have done less perfunctorily had they been given a
convincing reason. Unfortunately, Ms. Gandhi could not keep out
the carping tone.
And it was easy for the Prime Minister, master of the
parliamentary game, to show the Congress(I) criticism to be an
essay in nitpicking. But Mr. Vajpayee himself was not going to be
kind and gentle in the game of parliamentary oneupmanship; for
example, much to the delight of the treasury benches, he
challenged Ms. Gandhi to clear here and now the confusion over
her party's position on ``minimum nuclear deterrence.'' Ms.
Gandhi's response was an all-too-visible uncomfortable silence.
Mr. Vajpayee could and did take the high road and talked of
international respect, of contrast between democratic traditions
in India and authoritarian temptations in Pakistan; he contrasted
his own recollection of his ``responsible'' role as the Leader of
the Opposition with that of the Congress(I). His witty retorts
left the Congress(I) benches virtually speechless; a couple of
times Ms. Gandhi animatedly summoned this or that colleague,
urging that they join the argument with Mr. Vajpayee.
The treasury benches were naturally delighted with the Prime
Minister's performance; the BJP Ministers, in particular, had the
happy supercilious look that Pakistani players have when Shoaib
Akhtar wades through the Indian batsmen. Mr. Advani could even be
seen gleefully dry-rubbing his hands.
And it was left to Mr. Prakash Ambedkar of the Republican Party,
to force Mr. Vajpayee on the backfoot on the question of
Constitutional review. An undaunted Mr. Ambedkar punctured Mr.
Vajpayee's rhetorical flow, and made the Prime Minister look
pedestrian and partisan. The Prime Minister had to be prompted by
Mr. Arun Jaitely and Mr. Advani as Mr. Ambedkar refused to be
cowed down. And as is his wont, Mr. Pramod Mahajan had to
intervene and introduce a cantankerous note, inviting protests
from the Opposition benches. Indeed, Mr. Vajpayee ended on an
ordinary note.
At the end of the debate, it was not clear why the Congress(I)
parliamentarian tacticians insisted that Ms. Gandhi say her piece
just before Mr. Vajpayee; she could not even have the advantage
of having the last word. Unless, of course, the dynasty
fundamentalism enjoined that she persist in `prime ministerial'
pretensions.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : National Next : BJP allies meet today on rollback | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|