|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Wednesday, April 26, 2000 |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Front Page
| Next
We make no distinction: PM
By Our Special Correspondent
NEW DELHI, APRIL 25. In a major intervention, which the Prime
Minister Mr. Atal Behari Vajpayee, mistakenly termed as her
maiden speech in the Lok Sabha before correcting himself quickly,
the Congress(I) president, Ms. Sonia Gandhi, today questioned
almost every aspect of the BJP-led Government's policies but
reserved the sharpest barbs for its ``hidden agenda'' saying the
Congress(I) would be ``unrelenting'' in resisting attacks on
secularism.
In a spirited attack, while speaking on the motion of thanks to
the President's address which the House later adopted by voice
vote, the Leader of the Opposition said secularism had been
consistently under assault ever since the National Democratic
Alliance Government came to power. Though the Prime Minister had
tried occasionally to ``deflect'' these assaults it was ``not out
of deep conviction, but out of compulsion to protect the very
fragile coalition he heads.'' Her party, she declared reading
from a heavily marked text, would stand up to all ``overt'' and
``covert'' attempts to ``subvert'' secularism, the ``bedrock'' of
the Indian Constitution.
The Prime Minister, speaking immediately afterwards, quickly got
the issue out of the way with the familiar BJP argument that his
party and Government were as secular as anybody else and no
single party could claim to be the torchbearer of secularism. But
``our'' secularism - presumably unlike the Congress(I)'s -
treated all religions equally without making any distinctions.
``This is the basis and foundation of our secularism'', he said.
The recent attacks on Christian missionaries in Uttar Pradesh
were ``unfortunate'' and the Home Ministry had asked the State
Government to investigate and punish the guilty, he said.
The opposite poles of Indian politics couldn't have stood out in
sharper contrast as Ms. Sonia Gandhi and Mr. Vajpayee,
representing two different generations and two different
political cultures, slugged it out - one somewhat tentative but
sharply focussed, the other brimming with confidence but diffused
to the point of being evasive. The Left parties, in fact, walked
out protesting that the Prime Minister had ducked the most
important issue of the day: the recent price hike and its impact,
particularly on the very poor.
Ms. Sonia Gandhi, in her 25-minute speech, criticised the
Government's economic agenda saying the all-round hike in prices,
plus the cuts in subsidies, had exposed its ``anti-poor'' bias.
The Prime Minister, in his reply, skirted the issue of prices
altogether, barring a reference to the cut in fertilizer
subsidies. The subsidies, he said, were benefiting the industry
more than the farmers and accused the Congress(I) of changing its
stand on the issue.
He sought a political consensus on economic reforms and strongly
defended the proposed constitutional review assuring members that
the basic structure of the Constitution ``which includes
secularism'' would not be altered.
The ambience varied from pindrop silence when Ms. Gandhi spoke to
near chaos when the Prime Minister got up to rebut her charges.
The Prime Minister, however, didn't seem to mind and even
indulged the Opposition, telling an impatient Mr. Madhavrao
Scindia: ``Ek Gwalior wale ko doosre Gwalior wale ke saath yeh
nahin karna chahiye'' (fellow Gwalior-ians should not do this to
each other). In the end, what lingered was not so much the
rhetoric from the two sides as the style: and, for once, the
``Veterans XI'' looked a little jaded.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Front Page Next : Funds no constraint: PM | |
|
Front Page |
National |
International |
Regional |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyright © 2000 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|